ROGER MARTIN: This thing
called planning has been around for a long, long time. People would plan
out the activities they're going to engage in. More recently, has been a
discipline called strategy. People have put those two
things together to call something strategic planning. Unfortunately, those things
are not the same, strategy and planning. So just putting them
together and calling it strategic planning doesn't help. What most strategic planning
is in the world of business has nothing to do with strategy. It's got the word, but it's not. It's a set of activities
that the company says it's going to do. We're going to improve
customer experience. We're going to open
this new plant. We're going to start a new
talent development program. A whole list of them,
and they all sound good, but the results of
all of those are not going to make the company
happy because they didn't have a strategy. So what's a strategy? A strategy is an
integrative set of choices that positions you on a playing
field of your choice in a way that you win. So there's a theory. Strategy has a theory. Here's why we should be
on this playing field, not this other one, and here's
how, on that playing field, we're going to be
better than anybody else at serving the customers
on that playing field. That theory has to be coherent. It has to be doable. You have to be able to translate
that into actions for it to be a great strategy. Planning does not have to
have any such coherence, and it typically is what
people in manufacturing want-- the few things they want,
to build a new plant, and the marketing people
want to launch a new brand, and the talent people
want to hire more people-- that tends to be a list that
has no internal coherence to it and no specification
of a way that that is going to accomplish
collectively some goal for the company. See, planning is
quite comforting. Plans typically have to do
with the resources you're going to spend. So we're going to build a plan. We're going to hire some people. We're going to
launch a new product. Those are all things that are
on the cost side of businesses. Who controls your costs? Who's the customer
of your costs? The answer is, you are. You decide how many
square feet to lease, how many raw materials to
buy, how many people to hire. Those are more comfortable
because you control them. A strategy, on the other
hand, specifies an outcome, a competitive outcome
that you wish to achieve, which involves customers
wanting your product or service enough that they
will buy enough of it to make the profitability
that you'd like to make. The tricky thing about that is
that you don't control them. You might wish you
could, but you can't. They decide, not you. That's a harder trick. So that means putting
yourself out and saying, here's what we
believe will happen. We can't prove it in advance,
we can't guarantee it, but this is what we
want to have happen and that we believe will happen. It's much easier to say,
I'll build a factory, I will hire more
people, et cetera, than I will have customers end
up liking our offering more than those of competitors. The tricky thing about planning
is that while you're planning, chances are at
least one competitor is figuring out how to win. When US air carriers were busily
planning what routes to fly and da-da-da, there
was this little company in Texas called Southwest that
had a strategy for winning. And at first, that
looked largely irrelevant because it was tiny. What Southwest Airlines was
aiming for was an outcome. What they wanted to
be is a substitute for Greyhound, a way
more convenient way to get around at a price that
wasn't extraordinarily much greater than a Greyhound bus. Southwest said, everybody
else is flying hub and spoke. They have hubs, and
they fly hub and spoke. We're going to fly point to
point so that we don't have aircraft waiting on the ground
because you only make money when you're in the air. We're going to only fly
737s, one kind of aircraft, so that our gates
are set up for those, our systems are set up
for those, our training, our simulations are set up. We're not going to offer
meals on the flights because we're going to
specialize in short flights. We're not going to book
through travel agents. We're going to encourage
people to book online because that's less
expensive for everybody and more convenient. So their strategy ended up
having a substantially lower cost than any of the
major carriers so that they could offer
substantially lower prices. Because it had a
way of winning, it got bigger and then bigger and
then bigger and then bigger and bigger and bigger
and bigger until it flies the most passenger
seat miles in America. The major carriers
were not trying to win against one another. They were all playing
to play, as I say. They were playing to
participate, maybe buy more planes, get more
gates, maybe grow some, not having a theory of
here's how we could be better than our competitors. And that was fine until
somebody came along and said, here's a way to be
better than everybody else for this segment. And so that segment then goes. It's gone [FAST-MOVING SOUND]. And the main playing
to play players have to share a
smaller pie that's left over after Southwest
takes whatever share it wants. If you're trying to escape this
planning trap, this comfort trap of doing something
that's comfortable but not good for you, how do you start? The most important
thing to recognize is that strategy will have
angst associated with it. It'll make you feel somewhat
nervous because as a manager, chances are you've been
taught you should do things that you can prove in advance. You can't prove in advance that
your strategy will succeed. You can look at a plan and
say, well, all of these things are doable. Let's just do those because
they're within our control. But they won't add up to much. In strategy, you have
to say, if our theory is right about what we can do
and how the market will react, this will position us
in an excellent way. Just accept the fact that
you can't be perfect on that, and you can't know for sure. And that is not
being a bad manager. That is being a great
leader because you're giving your organization the
chance to do something great. The second thing I
do is say, lay out the logic of your
strategy clearly. What would have to be true about
ourselves, about the industry, about competition, about
customers for this strategy to work? Why do you do that? It's because you can then
watch the world unfold. And if something that you
say is in the logic that would have to be
true for this to work is not working out
quite the way you hoped, it'll allow you to
tweak your strategy. And strategy is a
journey, what you want to have as a mechanism
for tweaking it, honing it, and refining it so it
gets better and better as you go along. Another thing that
helps with strategy is not letting it
get overcomplicated. It's great if you can write
your strategy on a single page. Here's where we're
choosing to play. Here's how we're
choosing to win. Here are the capabilities
we need to have in place. Here are the management systems. And that's why it's going
to achieve this goal, this aspiration that we have. Then you lay out
the logic, what must be true for that all to
work out the way we hope. Go do it, and watch and
tweak as you go along. That may feel somewhat more
worry-making, angst-making than planning, but I would
tell you that if you plan, that's a way to
guarantee losing. If you do strategy, it gives
you the best possible chance of winning.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!