Article Public (all visitors)

Resolved: Debate is stupid | The Outline

The Outline 2018

Wow, that is correct and there is no counterargument. Debate is indeed very stupid.

But any form of debate is inherently flawed. The aim of debate is not to provide a detailed, cogent, well-sourced answer to the question at hand. The aim of debate is to be the most convincing, not the smartest, and anyone who’s good at debating knows this.

View Original Source

Curated by

FoundryBase

Updated 11 months ago

PUBLIC SPEAKING BIG IDEAS COMMUNICATION DEBATES

Save

Bookmark this resource

Browse more

View all Articles

Summary:

The main message of this article is that debate has become a superficial activity which does not lead to any meaningful or productive dialogue. The author argues that the purpose of debating is more about being convincing and not necessarily smart or well informed. This article critiques the modern form of debating, suggesting that it does not produce thoughtful discourse but rather superficial conversations with no real resolution. The author believes that true learning cannot be achieved when debating solely for the purpose of defeating an opposing argument.

Keywords: Debate, Stupid, Flawed, Convincing, Smart, Discourse

Contribute to FoundryBase

Resolved: Debate is stupid | The Outline

FoundryBase

More from source

Found something worth adding?