Article Public (all visitors)

Three myths about scientific peer review | Michael Nielsen

What’s the future of scientific peer review? The way science is communicated is currently changing rapidly, leading to speculation that the peer review system itself might change. For example, the wildly successful physics preprint arXiv is only very lightly moderated, which has led many people to wonder if the peer review process might perhaps die out, or otherwise change beyond recognition.

Curated by

FoundryBase

Updated 11 months ago

Browse more

View all Articles

Continue from source

More from source

Browse more from michaelnielsen.org

Contribute to FoundryBase

Found something worth adding?

Sign in to suggest resources and start building your own collection.